Canadian Magnificent class Nuclear Light Aircraft Carrier:
In the 2070's the US Navy was strained to the breaking point. Global tensions had risen to a level never before recorded. What was being called "Brush Fire" wars were raging in Africa, Asia, and South America. The New Soviet Navy was pressuring both NATO and NEMA on all the seas. Though the US Navy had 17 large-deck (Nimitz, Coral Sea, and Ranger classes) and 3 small-deck (Avenger class) carriers, it could not meet the commitments required of it. Fortunately the US was joined by two growing powers in the Northern Eagle Military Alliance (NEMA). Canada and Mexico had taken tremendous bounds in society, technology and politics. Through a joint venture, all three countries designed a powerful yet small aircraft carrier design that helped to take some pressure off of the United States in this time of great turmoil.
Though the Canadian and Mexican governments were on a major upswing, they did not have the same capital and shipbuilding expertise the US had in carrier design. In fact only Canada had ever operated any carriers and that was over 100 years before they began considering operating carriers. To that end, it was primarily the US who did the initial development of the new carrier design. They decided to expand upon the American Avenger (CVE-140) design for several reasons. The most important of these was that most of the conflicts required ships to operate in shallow waters to get close enough to do any good. The large-decked US carriers had difficulty operating in shallow waters like the Persian Gulf and Red Sea. In the close quarters of the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of St. Lawrence the US carriers would not have room to maneuver and would be susceptible to multiple danger not encountered in open water. Also, the US was very capable of handling the open water missions against the Soviet, Chinese, and Indian navies with its large carriers. They would be able to support the smaller carriers closer to shore while staying further out to sea. The new carrier was designed with all this in mind. The over-riding need for hulls on the battle line limited the amount of research that could be done. Therefore the NEMA designers began work on modifying the hull and superstructure of the Avenger to capitalize on the lessons learned from the escort carriers. The new carrier class was much larger and was more accurately considered a light carrier
The designers could not help but notice the similarity between the new carrier class and the British Ark Royal class. One of the Mexican designers also noted a similarity between the new carrier they were developing and a light carrier design from the late 1970's that the US had canceled. During that time period, there was much thought of building smaller aircraft carriers rather than larger (aka Nimitz class) ones. The new carrier designation, CVV, was conceived with this prospect in mind. The vessel was an attempt provide limited power projection at a lost cost than the much larger Nimitz class. Ultimately, the idea was abandoned, but before that happened blueprints of the finalized design were finished. Noting the greater capability of the Ark Royal class and the CVV concept than a Avenger class, they abandoned the ski-jump and integrated the angled flight deck of the CVV design.
Vast changes to the original design had to be made. Unlike the Avenger class, the new carrier would be powered by a pair of fusion reactors. They provided more than enough power for the ship, making the design capable of 32 knots. While not as fast of most United States super carriers, the carriers were the equal of the Avenger class escort carrier and British Ark Royal class carrier. Advanced automation was incorporated into the design, vastly reducing the crew necessary to run the ship compared to older carriers of a similar size. For example the Midway class carrier required a crew of around 2500 and an air wing of around 1700. American carrier personnel were initially assigned to the Canadian and Mexican carriers and assisted in the training of the crews of the new carriers. Weaponry is for self defense only and incorporates three American combination rail gun and short range missile launchers. One the rear of the superstructure was an American tactical length Mk-41 vertical launch missile system. The older system was adopted to reduce costs and there was insufficient shape for the more capable MK-55 system or any type of reload system. In the last carrier of the class designed for Canada, this system was replaced with the MK-59 vertical launch missile system by relocating other systems under the position of the launchers.
Interestingly, the dimensions for the Canadian and Mexican light carrier came out to be virtually identical to the CVV concept. Electromagnetic catapults were fitted although most of the NEMA's aircraft were VSTOL. This was done to allow older craft of other allied nations to deploy from the decks of the ships as needed. Canada purchased the APAR 10 radar system which four plane system acted as both a search radar and a fire control radar. Mexico chose the less expensive route and chose the American the SPX-1A radar instead of the APAR system carried on the Canadian Carriers. This single rotating phased array system was not as powerful as those on other carrier designs, but was felt adequate for the light carrier's design. No sonar system was originally incorporated into the design, but the last Canadian carrier was completed with a hull sonar system. The system was installed on the older Canadian carriers as they came into dock for routine maintenance but was not installed in the Mexican carrier. While not a stealth design compared to the newer American carriers, some minimal attempted were made to reduce the radar signature of the light carrier. Of course the ship was constructed of the advanced alloys and composites that the military had become so fond of.
The title CVVN was at first adopted for the new class, but was replaced with the original CVLN designation just before the first vessel was commissioned. It was felt that the designation could too easily be confused with the CVN title and might give a wrong impression about the carrier's capabilities. A total of five vessels were built for the Canadian and Mexican navies during the Twenty-Seventies and Twenty-Eighties. Three were built for Canada while only one was built for Mexico. The Canadian carriers were named the Magnificent, Bonaventure, and Eagle. The Mexican carrier was named Quetzalcoatl Original an additional Mexican carrier was planned but construction was cancelled before it was laid down. The concept of the light carrier was brought in front of the United States Congress but the Navy persuaded the legislature to continue funding full sized carriers. They cited the greater capabilities of the Saratoga class CVN which was under development.
The air wings of the ships were tailored to meet the needs and desires of each country. The Mexican ship tended to use more recent US aircraft while the Canadians used both British and US designs. Both countries used the Silver Eagle SAMAS as the standard power armor on the ships, in keeping with NEMA practices.
The ships were very useful and did help to relieve some of the pressure on the US Navy. Canada used two carriers in the North Atlantic and one in the North Pacific, patrolling the oceans and coasts against Soviet forces. This allowed the American carriers to patrol further forward. The Mexican navy operated their carrier primarily in the Atlantic and helped guard the East Coast of Central America from hostilities.
Model Type: Warrior class Multi Purpose Light Aircraft Carrier
Vehicle Type: Ocean, Escort Aircraft Carrier
Crew:
Ships Crew: 820 (65 officers, 30 chief petty officers, 725 enlisted
[Has a high degree of automation])
Air Wing: 1140 (78 Pilots, 32 flight deck officers, 440 enlisted)
Troops: 100 (40 pilots for "Silver Eagle" SAMAS power Armor,
60 soldiers in body armor)
Robots, Power Armors, and Vehicles:
Power Armors:
| 30 | PA-04A "Silver Eagle" SAMAS |
| 2 | EV-84A General Cargo / Search and Rescue | |
| 8 | EVS-84A Anti-Submarine Warfare | |
| 4 | EVE-84A Electronics Warfare | |
| 18 | FV-38 Panther II VSTOL Fighter | |
| 8 | S-14 Buccaneer VTOL Jet Fighter/Bombers | |
| 4 | FV-45-EW Sea Hawk VTOL Jet Jamming Fighters | |
| 4 | Utility Tilt Rotors |
| 2 | EV-84A General Cargo / Search and Rescue | |
| 6 | EVS-84A Anti-Submarine Warfare | |
| 4 | EVE-84A Electronics Warfare | |
| 24 | FV-45 Sea Hawk VTOL Jet Fighters | |
| 6 | FV-45-EW Sea Hawk VTOL Jet Jamming Fighters | |
| 6 | CV-22N Osprey Utility Tilt Rotors. |
M.D.C. by location:
| [1] Electromagnetic Catapults (2): | 100 each | |
| [1] Arrester Cables (3): | 50 each | |
| [2] Elevators (2): | 200 each | |
| Hanger Doors (2): | 200 each | |
| [3] Flight Deck: | 2,250 | |
| Mk 44 Combination Anti-Missile System (3, Flight Deck): | 200 each | |
| Mk-59 48 Cell Vertical Missile Launchers (Superstructure): | 300 | |
| Chaff Launchers (2, Superstructure): | 10 each | |
| [4] APAR Radar Systems (4, Canadian Carriers): | 100 each | |
| [4] SPX-1A Phase Array Radar System (Mexican Carriers): | 200 each | |
| [5] Bridge / Command Tower: | 1,200 | |
| Outer Hull (per 40 foot / 12.2 meter area): | 80 | |
| [6] Main Body: | 7,500 |
Notes:
[1] If the catapults are destroyed, non-VTOL or STOL aircraft cannot
be launched. If Arrester Cables are destroyed, non-VTOL or STOL aircraft
cannot land until arrester cables are replaced.
[2] If all three elevators are destroyed, no aircraft can be moved
from the hangers to the main flight deck.
[3] If the flight decks are destroyed, only VTOL aircraft can be launched
or land. VTOL aircraft are at -15% to piloting.
[4] APAR: Destroying Phase Array radar panels will destroy the
ship's fire control systems but secondary systems have backup systems and
panels can compensate for each other. All Bonuses are lost if panels are
destroyed.
SPX-1A: Destroying the Phase Array radar panel will destroy
the ship's main fire control systems but the vessel has backup systems
with a shorter range (Equal to robot vehicle sensors)
[5] If Forward Control Bridge and Rear Control Tower are destroyed,
the ship can still be piloted from engineering but with a -15% to piloting
rolls. Communication and sensor equipment are not concentrated on the bridge
to reduce the effectiveness of bridge hits.
[6] Destroying the main body destroys propulsion and power systems,
disabling the ship. The ship is fitted with an advanced polymer armor that
allows the ship to withstand up to -3000 MDC before losing structural integrity
and sinking. There are enough life preservers and inflatable lifeboats
to accommodate everyone on the ship.
Speed:
Surface: 36.8 mph (32 knots/ 59.3 kph)
Maximum Effective Range: Unlimited due to fusion engines (needs to refuel every
20 years and requires maintenance as well). Ship carries six months of
supplies on board.
Statistical Data:
Length: 912 feet (meters) overall
Draft: 34.5 feet (11.9 meters)
Width: 126 feet (76.5 meters)
Displacement: 45,200 tons standard and 59,800 tons fully loaded
Cargo: 5,000 tons of nonessential equipment and supplies. Each
enlisted crewmember has a small locker for personal items and uniforms.
Ships officers have more space for personal items. Extra ammo, armor, troops,
weapons, and engines take up most of the ship's spaces.
Power System: 2 Fusion Reactors, average life span is 20 years
Market Cost: Not for Sale but costs around 1 billion credits
to construct. If found and sold on the black market would probably cost
2 to 3 billion credits.
WEAPON SYSTEMS:
Special Systems:
The ship has all systems standard on a robot vehicle plus the following
special features:
[Golden Age Weaponsmiths and Triax are trademarks owned by Kevin Siembieda and
Palladium Books Inc. ]
[ Rifts® is a registered trademark owned by Kevin Siembieda and
Palladium Books Inc.]
Image drawn and copyrighted by Kitsune (E-Mail Kitsune) & Mischa (E-Mail Mischa). Click on line drawing for a better view.
By Kamikazi (kamikazi_gm@hotmail.com) and Kitsune (E-Mail Kitsune).
Copyright © 2003, Kamikazi & Kitsune. All rights reserved.